The ring of gyges argument

Important terms used in discussion of this reading include: Anyone who is caught should be thought inept, for the extreme of injustice is to be believed to be just without being just…We must allow that, while doing the greatest injustice, he has nonetheless provided himself with the greatest reputation for justice Essentially, he believes all persons are selfish, self-interested, and egoistic.

Making the point that perhaps justice for the individual is secondary to the overall justice of the state for it benefits the individual greater than would everyone pursuing his own ends without the help of a just city.


If we take away these rewards then we would have no reason to be just. Thus, he thinks, it is in our self-interest to obey the law because we fear the consequences if we were to get caught disobeying the law. But the egoist cannot want others to act as he does because such an action is not in his self-interest.

Both the unjust and the just person would use its magic powers because one would be a fool not to do what personally pays him much better.

Or do you think there is any other cause for the founding of cities? Well, then, you certainly aren't doing what you want. Thrasymachus had insisted that justice is The ring of gyges argument the advantage of the stronger man, and that injustice will remain to be more masterly than justice The Republic by Plato.

Why Be Good? Plato

In telling this story, Glaucon is arguing that men behave in just ways not because they are inherently just, but because they will face consequences for behaving unjustly: Glaucon believes human beings practice justice in order to avoid the harm that would come to them if they disobeyed the laws of the society.

Arriving at the palace, he used his new power of invisibility to seduce the queen, and with her help he murdered the king, and became king of Lydia himself. Irony and the Socratic Method: The story is about a shepherd in service of the ruler of Lydia, who, by accident, finds a magical ring with a magical ability; wearing it grants the power of invisibility.

Get Full Essay Get access to this section to get all help you need with your essay and educational issues. The just man is the happy man.

Examples of Purely Instrumental Goods: Indeed, what subject could someone with any understanding enjoy discussing more often? Other exceptions to the supposition that all persons act selfishly include the following types of actions.

Glaucon then asks the question: By using a ring of invisibility as an example, Glaucon argues that anyone and everyone, just or unjust, would end up on the path of injustice if there were no one to observe and punish their unjust behavior. We use justice to get a reputation for being just, we want a reputation for being just for the honor and the rewards it leads to, and we desire these rewards because we think they will lead to happiness.

Where do you put justice? Invisibility, in this case, is just a way of taking observers out of the picture. His argument is intended to show that justice might just be an instrumental good, in the sense, that it is something we use as a means to achieve another good.

The Ring of Gyges Argument Essay Sample

If a person could be certain not only that an action resulting in personal benefit would not be discovered but also that if this action were discovered, no punishing consequences would follow, then would there any reason for that person to act morally?

However, in the dialog Socrates goes on to explain that justice would not be defined by just this social construct; the man that abused the power of the Ring of Gyges has become morally bankrupt and suffered irreperable failings of character, while a man that chose willingly not to use it is at least at peace with himself.

One cannot exist without the other. Try to think of your own examples then click for some of ours. Justice is not a good to the individual, for every one is unjust whenever he thinks injustice possible.

Socrates has forced Thrasymachus to reluctantly retreat from this position, and Glaucon takes up the argument with his story of the ring. Remember from the Apology, Socrates argued that he knew nothing.

If this were the case, people would soon realize that they should not want to be just, but to be believed to be just, Glaucon argues. Instrumental and Intrinsic Goods: Like his teacher Socrates and his student Aristotle, Plato was deeply concerned with what it meant to be a virtuous human being.

Sometimes persons act from spite or in self-defeating ways. Glaucon challenges Socrates to find a reason to welcome justice for its own sake, in other words find the actual, intrinsic, good of being just and not only because society rewards you for it.

Glaucon strengthens his argument Glaucon presents Socrates with two major points. According to Glaucon, how does the practice of justice arise?Compared with feldman’s argument, the tale of “the ring of gyges” is best described as a counterclaim.

Thank you for posting your question here at brainly/5(11). The Ring of Gyges argument is intended to show that people don’t practice justice because it is good, but because they are unable (too weak) to do injustice without punishment. This view supports Thrasymarchus’ argument that justice is the advantage of the stronger and Glaucon proposes that “the best is to do injustice without paying the.

According to the tradition, Gyges was a shepherd in the service of the king of Lydia; there was a great storm, and an earthquake made an opening in the earth at the place where he was feeding his flock.

In conclusion, it is clear that the story of The Ring of Gyges is significant in the Republic book II as the ring is connected with injustice because it tempted Gyges and gave him the power to do. The Ring of Gyges Argument Essay Paper 1 (A) The Ring of Gyges Argument The bottom line of Thrasymarchus’ argument is that justice is the advantage of the.

He proposes a mind-experiment: the myth of the magic ring of Gyges. (Note how any effectiveness of his argument is actually an ad populum fallacy.) Glaucon argues that if someone had a ring which made him invisible, then that person would be foolish not to use it for personal advantage.

The ring of gyges argument
Rated 5/5 based on 87 review