Kills classroom atmosphere That inaccessible barrier the educator has created can make the classroom a place of dread instead of learning. In order to keep their sense of responsibility and self-discipline, strict teachers would keep their class in control and develop the stern guidelines such as ask the students to stand in front of the class for the whole of the learning activity if one them are shouting or making other noises.
Class-hour controls account for whether students perform differently at different hours of the day, such as before or after lunch. Using both personalities at once.
Whereas a more lenient educator may rationalize that it is not normal for that student and let it be, but the strict educator is governed by the rules and there are usually no exceptions. Each personality is like a double edge sword that helps and hurts at the same time.
Query for applying strict discipline on students Table 5. Students may not learn the responsibilities of being a student which may have consequences down the road.
Students in classrooms without Internet-connected devices earned the highest average score of In a study, James Kraushaar and David Novak found that students using laptops in class had non-course-related software open and active 42 percent of the time, and a study by Carrie Fried found that students report increased multitasking when laptops are in the classroom.
Other indigenous scholars are of a 5 broader opinion, one of such scholars is Oni, Should they embrace computers and put technology at the center of their instruction? Twenty teachers each and the principals of the above schools were involved in the research; the principals of these schools were 10 interviewed.
An educator who is overly strict could cause students to break rules as a form of protest.
The study had three objectives; 1. In order to keep their sense of responsibility and self-discipline, strict teachers would keep their class in control and develop the stern guidelines such as ask the students to stand in front of the class for the whole of the learning activity if one them are shouting or making other noises.
Lack of discipline in schools can be linked to increased exam mal-practices in the state. It may become a joke amongst the students of how they anger the educator. In the positive side, it creates well organized class; motivated students; and maximum teacher respect.
Finally, classes are well-structured: The strict educator understands that playing favorites diminishes the rules and will not let that happen. Students in classrooms where only tablets were allowed under strict conditions did slightly better, with an average score of Although students overwhelmingly like to use their devices, a growing research base finds little evidence of positive effects and plenty of indications of potential harm.
When asked if the respondents agreed with applying strict discipline on students, majority of the respondents did not agreed with the idea of applying strict disciplinary measures. Our primary outcome is student performance on the mandatory, high-stakes final exam for the course.
Sometimes educators get really upset and yell at the students. The scholar also submitted that, every member of the society have a role to play. How can you be more balanced? If the students have a connection with the educator and they do something that causes the educator to fume the entire lesson, then the students feel bad and the ability to learn is hampered.
Teachers with a stern profile who are usually perfectionist do not realize that the students will be afraid to approach them. There are a number of theories to form a comprehensive discipline strategy for an entire school or a particular class. As stated above, we do not claim that all computer use in the classroom is harmful.
The strict educator is normally guided by rules which allow a systematic management of students. Admonishing students in front of class can be counter-productive sometimes.
If a joke is out of the question, then a smile to show no anger for the mistake. We randomly assigned sections to one of the three groups in a way that ensured each professor taught at least one section in the technology-free group and at least one section in either of the other groups.
That kind of impolite behavior cannot be reduced if there is no certain serious handling that can make them learn their lesson. Schools should make use of guidance and counseling experts more.
Those haters usually do not feel comfortable with our stern rules, so they try to oppose those rules by conducting such rebellion. This will allow the educator to gain popularity which may garner more respect from the students.And moderate discipline will make students to be focused, but strict discipline does not really make any positive impact on the students.
Therefore, strict discipline has a negative impact on students‟ academic performance, thus, student should be. Nancy Darling, PhD, a psychology professor at Oberlin College, says, "It's a sign that you are too strict for everyone’s good if you set so many rules that you can’t possibly enforce them all.
May 19, · Besides, being a strict teacher will also triggers students’ rebellion because it is an undeniable fact that being a strict teacher often means that we are going to be a teacher with a lot of haters, which are our own students.
The Reading Matrix Vol. 5, No.
2, September A STUDY ON TEACHER CHARACTERISTICS AND THEIR EFFECTS ON STUDENTS ATTITUDES Fırat Açıkgöz. However, similar to a strict educator, even though students are allowed to be free, too much freedom can have adverse affects on the classroom and students.
Pros 1. Students in classrooms where only tablets were allowed under strict conditions did slightly better, with an average score of percent, but they still had lower scores than students in the technology-free group.Download